You post a job for an AI engineer. Within a week, you are staring at a salary expectation that looks less like a paycheck and more like a company’s quarterly earnings report. You re-read it. And yes, that comma is in the right place.
This is the situation of the tech market, where “competitive salary” has become a punchline and “market rate” changes faster than anything.
If you are a TA professional who has to deliver bad budget news to hiring managers every Monday, you already know this is not a one-off story. It is the story. And it is time we talked about it honestly.
Nobody will accept this on their own, but this mess was self-inflicted.
When AI, machine learning, and cloud computing stopped being buzzwords and started being business necessities, every company suddenly needed the same small pool of people. Not a big pool. A small one.
These skills were not taught at scale a decade ago, so there was no bench of ready talent waiting in the wings. There was just a handful of people who actually knew what they were doing, and a very long line of companies waving offer letters at them.
And when demand sprints way ahead of supply, you do not get a normal market. You get a bidding war.
In reality, most of the professionals who changed companies in the last few years were not even looking for a new job. They were found. A recruiter slid into their inbox with a number that was hard to say no to – a hike, a signing bonus, equity, something that sounded like a lottery.
Once one company did this, everyone had to. Nobody wants to be the last person still offering “market rate” while three competitors are offering “market rate plus a small car”.
This is how you get artificial salary inflation – pay that is not tied to productivity, business impact, or even scarcity in a fair sense, but to sheer panic. It is less “war for talent” and more of an “auction house” where the one bidding the highest takes the talent.
And the funniest thing is that the people benefiting from this the most know exactly what is happening. But can you really blame them for accepting more and more money?
The problem is not just that salaries went up. It is what came with the salary hikes.
Sound familiar? If you agree with even two of these, you are not alone. Industry compensation surveys over the past couple of years have consistently flagged pay compression and short-tenure hiring as top disruptors in tech workforce planning – this is not a hunch – it is a pattern.
The instinct to counteroffer every time someone gets poached feels reasonable in the moment. But it is a bit like putting out a kitchen fire by throwing more oil on it because it “worked” the last time you needed light.
Eventually, you are not managing compensation – compensation is managing you.
The real issue is not that your offers are too low. It is that your pipeline is too shallow, your upskilling is too slow, and your dependency on a tiny pool of “ready-made” experts is too high.
Let’s get practical, because most of us already know the problems, we need solutions.
None of these are overnight fixes. But salary inflation did not happen overnight either – it built up slowly, then hit all at once, like a plot twist no one saw coming.
Salary inflation in tech hiring is not a temporary glitch that will fix itself once “the market cools down”. It is a symptom of a structural talent shortage that companies created together, offer by offer, poach by poach.
The businesses that come out ahead will not be the ones with the deepest pockets. They will be the ones that stopped playing defence and started building their own talent pipelines, fixing their internal equity, and making their employer brand more than just the number on an offer letter.
So, ask yourself – are you still bidding in an auction with no ceiling, or are you ready to build a strategy that does not need one?